What is it about neurological pain, as opposed to other forms of suffering, that makes the pain experienced by humans and many animals morally relevant?
Imagine an intelligent, autonomous robot that reacts to damage the way a human reacts to pain - fear, cries, complaints, etc. Why wouldn't the "pain" of the robot be morally relevant?
Similarly, why isn't the suffering of plants considered to be morally relevant?
Read another response by Gordon Marino
Read another response about Ethics