So I'm reading The Power of Logic, 4th edition. While on a section describing Modus Tollen it says that,
Not A; If A, then B; So, Not B
is an example of Modus Tollen. My question is how can that be if the conclusion of Modus Tollens is suppose to deny the consequent? Am i reading it wrong or just missing something? Keep in mine im still not beyond chapter 1.
Read another response by Richard Heck
Read another response about Logic