Does Goedel's incompletness therom demonstrate that logic cannot be shown to be

Does Goedel's incompletness therom demonstrate that logic cannot be shown to be

Does Goedel's incompletness therom demonstrate that logic cannot be shown to be consistent and complete because we cannot prove a system of logic without relying on logic or begging the question? In other words; does it reveal a fallacy of "pretended neutrality"?

Read another response by Richard Heck
Read another response about Logic
Print