There seem to be two major assertions about how an artwork comes into existence: the first one considers the artist to have some kind of access to the "essence of truth" or something like that; the artist receives the idea in an inspirational moment and consequently creates the artwork on that foundation afterwards. The second assertion considers art to be the product of a huge mental or bodily effort.
The second one is undermined by the statements of many artists. But what do you think about the first assertion? I'm not sure about refusing it right away.
Read another response by Mitch Green
Read another response about Art