As in literary or film criticism, often some aspects or compositions are "over

As in literary or film criticism, often some aspects or compositions are "over

As in literary or film criticism, often some aspects or compositions are "over-analyzed." I mean this in the same way that a metaphor can be belabored. Could such a thing be true of philosophy? Can a work of philosophy be "over-analyzed" or belabored? Is there any theory or treatment of the problem of "over-analysis" or do you think this could never possibly be a problem since analysis is always good. N.B.

Read another response by Eddy Nahmias
Read another response about Philosophy
Print