Hume stated that there is a gap between "is" and "ought." What about hypothetical imperatives?
For example, it seems that, given a certain state of the material world, if I want to arrive on time for a certain meeting, then I ought to leave the house before, say, 8 AM. Did Hume's statement make room for such constructions, or does he not believe that the premises of hypothetical imperatives justify their normative conclusions?
Read another response by Bette Manter, Douglas Burnham
Read another response about Philosophers