If a newspaper receives letters to the editor taking a position that has been

If a newspaper receives letters to the editor taking a position that has been

If a newspaper receives letters to the editor taking a position that has been proven factually inaccurate, is it nevertheless the editor's responsibility to print one or more of these letters? Is it more important to demonstrate that others hold a different point of view, however inaccurate, or to convey only accurate information? (Maybe this example is too political or specific, but this came up in regards to the subject of where President Obama was born.)

Read another response by Thomas Pogge
Read another response about Business
Print