For what I've seen until now, logical laws are always assumed to be necessarily true (in the "all possible worlds" sense), but is it possible that this necessity is weaker? Is it possible that our logical capabilities are adaptations to physical regularities of the actual world and are still evolving, together with our minds? If our logical capabilities are tracking our evolution, then the Necessity of Logic laws could be only Physical, instead of Metaphysical, and there could be possible worlds where the Physics would constrain Logic differently. This (I think) would also have implications regarding the Ontological commitment of Logic: instead of assuming that there is none, it would be possible, even likely, that the physical existents of the World would appear in our logical theories. Has anyone put forward sustained arguments for/against this?