Law What was the biggest procedural error made at Socrates' Trial that no fair legal system today would make? Why didn't those Greeks think about it back then? Read more about What was the biggest procedural error made at Socrates' Trial that no fair legal 1 comment Log in to post comments
Philosophers Law Do philosophers make good lawyers? If not is that due to a fault in the legal profession or philosophy itself? Read more about Do philosophers make good lawyers? If not is that due to a fault in the legal 1 comment Log in to post comments
Law Are citizens in the US obligated to obey the law just because it is the law? If one reserves the right of civil disobedience, doesn't that imply that the state's authority is ultimate not legitimate? Thanks for continuing this site. Read more about Are citizens in the US obligated to obey the law just because it is the law? If 1 comment Log in to post comments
Law How much of the laws on the books today were written by philosophers of law? It seems to me that the overwhelming majority of laws were written by people with JDs ergo people with degrees in which philosophy of law was not an important subject during their education. If they had more training in the philosophy of law would law be More efficient and fairer? Read more about How much of the laws on the books today were written by philosophers of law? It 1 comment Log in to post comments
Law Do you think that contempt of court through judicial discretion is unjust especially in jurisdictions that allow for jury nullification? Lawyers conduct character assassinations in the witness box all the time, and judges don't always enforce contempt rulings consistently even within the same day. I know character assassinations are something most philosophers and even some lawyers frown upon but as long as that CAN lead to uncovering the truth why not let up to twelve jurors decide for themselves--because judges either don't care or are unable to recognize this (not that they should) why does it matter what the judge thinks and why should lawyers care either? Juries decide serious cases and the role of judges in any just society is merely to enforce procedures, and even then they are not required by law to inform juries of the option of jury nullification and are not required to defend their state-protected deontic legitimacy. Read more about Do you think that contempt of court through judicial discretion is unjust 1 comment Log in to post comments
Ethics Law A very close relative of mine admitted to committing a murder, but revealed few details about the crime. Do I have an ethical obligation to report what I've heard, even though I doubt very much that there is enough information there to lead to an indictment/trial/et cetera? Of course legally I'm not expected to incriminate an immediate family member, but my conscience seems to be pushing me towards reporting the information despite the lack of any significant real world consequences for the relative. Read more about A very close relative of mine admitted to committing a murder, but revealed few 1 comment Log in to post comments
Ethics Law If we accept that caring for disabled members is an obligation of all society, is it permissible to prevent people from disabling themselves? Read more about If we accept that caring for disabled members is an obligation of all society, 1 comment Log in to post comments
Law Ethics I'm a lawyer. One of my previous clients asked me for specific legal advice that he later used to commit financial fraud. I strongly suspected at the time that he was going to use my advice for that very purpose but I told him anyway because I like him as a person and I also disagree with the law that prohibits the particular type of fraud that he committed. Have I acted immorally according to virtue ethics? Read more about I'm a lawyer. One of my previous clients asked me for specific legal advice that 1 comment Log in to post comments
Law Religion Justice Scalia famously stated that crosses on graves have, well, crossed-over from an overtly religious symbol to one that may represent any dead soldier. How do philosophers treat such claims? How do we establish when religious practices, symbols, rituals, etc. have entered the secular public domain to the extent that the law can recognize them as such? Read more about Justice Scalia famously stated that crosses on graves have, well, crossed-over 1 comment Log in to post comments
Freedom Law If we have no free will, then is the entire legal system redundant since no one can be held accountable for anything since no one has control over their own actions? Read more about If we have no free will, then is the entire legal system redundant since no one 4 comments Log in to post comments