Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

88
 questions about 
Physics
2
 questions about 
Culture
2
 questions about 
Action
31
 questions about 
Space
208
 questions about 
Science
67
 questions about 
Feminism
80
 questions about 
Death
58
 questions about 
Punishment
151
 questions about 
Existence
39
 questions about 
Race
117
 questions about 
Children
221
 questions about 
Value
170
 questions about 
Freedom
75
 questions about 
Beauty
34
 questions about 
Music
96
 questions about 
Time
110
 questions about 
Animals
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
392
 questions about 
Religion
36
 questions about 
Literature
4
 questions about 
Economics
218
 questions about 
Education
54
 questions about 
Medicine
244
 questions about 
Justice
75
 questions about 
Perception
24
 questions about 
Suicide
51
 questions about 
War
124
 questions about 
Profession
27
 questions about 
Gender
23
 questions about 
History
287
 questions about 
Language
154
 questions about 
Sex
89
 questions about 
Law
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
134
 questions about 
Love
43
 questions about 
Color
77
 questions about 
Emotion
70
 questions about 
Truth
68
 questions about 
Happiness
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
284
 questions about 
Mind
110
 questions about 
Biology
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
374
 questions about 
Logic
32
 questions about 
Sport
81
 questions about 
Identity
69
 questions about 
Business
105
 questions about 
Art
58
 questions about 
Abortion

ask a question

recent responses

all topics

info

⚲

Question of the Day

Hello! I'd like to ask about syllogisms. I have a particular problem when understanding this certain syllogism: Some girls are single. Some girls are sad. Therefore, some girls are single and sad. While I think it is valid, I cannot fully make an accurate explanation as to why it is. Hoping somebody could help me. Thanks!

The syllogism in question is not valid. Nothing logically guarantees that the set of single girls and the set of sad girls overlap. Even if both sets have members, it does not follow that they have any members in common. Compare: Some polygons are squares. Some polygons are triangles. But it is false that some polygons are square triangles.