Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

81
 questions about 
Identity
32
 questions about 
Sport
110
 questions about 
Biology
69
 questions about 
Business
89
 questions about 
Law
80
 questions about 
Death
77
 questions about 
Emotion
154
 questions about 
Sex
208
 questions about 
Science
24
 questions about 
Suicide
392
 questions about 
Religion
117
 questions about 
Children
58
 questions about 
Abortion
124
 questions about 
Profession
88
 questions about 
Physics
39
 questions about 
Race
31
 questions about 
Space
287
 questions about 
Language
75
 questions about 
Beauty
36
 questions about 
Literature
58
 questions about 
Punishment
4
 questions about 
Economics
170
 questions about 
Freedom
221
 questions about 
Value
68
 questions about 
Happiness
51
 questions about 
War
54
 questions about 
Medicine
374
 questions about 
Logic
27
 questions about 
Gender
70
 questions about 
Truth
134
 questions about 
Love
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
23
 questions about 
History
284
 questions about 
Mind
110
 questions about 
Animals
75
 questions about 
Perception
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
96
 questions about 
Time
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
218
 questions about 
Education
67
 questions about 
Feminism
2
 questions about 
Action
105
 questions about 
Art
43
 questions about 
Color
34
 questions about 
Music
2
 questions about 
Culture
151
 questions about 
Existence
244
 questions about 
Justice

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.