Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

34
 questions about 
Music
4
 questions about 
Economics
284
 questions about 
Mind
110
 questions about 
Biology
110
 questions about 
Animals
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
2
 questions about 
Culture
244
 questions about 
Justice
32
 questions about 
Sport
374
 questions about 
Logic
218
 questions about 
Education
2
 questions about 
Action
36
 questions about 
Literature
96
 questions about 
Time
287
 questions about 
Language
54
 questions about 
Medicine
27
 questions about 
Gender
170
 questions about 
Freedom
39
 questions about 
Race
58
 questions about 
Punishment
77
 questions about 
Emotion
151
 questions about 
Existence
24
 questions about 
Suicide
58
 questions about 
Abortion
117
 questions about 
Children
69
 questions about 
Business
68
 questions about 
Happiness
67
 questions about 
Feminism
75
 questions about 
Beauty
89
 questions about 
Law
80
 questions about 
Death
70
 questions about 
Truth
23
 questions about 
History
88
 questions about 
Physics
221
 questions about 
Value
51
 questions about 
War
81
 questions about 
Identity
392
 questions about 
Religion
208
 questions about 
Science
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
43
 questions about 
Color
134
 questions about 
Love
154
 questions about 
Sex
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
124
 questions about 
Profession
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
105
 questions about 
Art
31
 questions about 
Space
75
 questions about 
Perception

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.