Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

151
 questions about 
Existence
31
 questions about 
Space
58
 questions about 
Punishment
27
 questions about 
Gender
34
 questions about 
Music
2
 questions about 
Action
75
 questions about 
Perception
88
 questions about 
Physics
110
 questions about 
Biology
68
 questions about 
Happiness
392
 questions about 
Religion
39
 questions about 
Race
4
 questions about 
Economics
80
 questions about 
Death
124
 questions about 
Profession
58
 questions about 
Abortion
96
 questions about 
Time
374
 questions about 
Logic
221
 questions about 
Value
218
 questions about 
Education
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
105
 questions about 
Art
208
 questions about 
Science
284
 questions about 
Mind
43
 questions about 
Color
89
 questions about 
Law
70
 questions about 
Truth
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
110
 questions about 
Animals
77
 questions about 
Emotion
117
 questions about 
Children
287
 questions about 
Language
81
 questions about 
Identity
51
 questions about 
War
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
154
 questions about 
Sex
244
 questions about 
Justice
75
 questions about 
Beauty
2
 questions about 
Culture
54
 questions about 
Medicine
170
 questions about 
Freedom
36
 questions about 
Literature
134
 questions about 
Love
69
 questions about 
Business
24
 questions about 
Suicide
23
 questions about 
History
67
 questions about 
Feminism
32
 questions about 
Sport

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.