Does "intrinsic value" - i.e., the value that nature has as of itself, as

Does "intrinsic value" - i.e., the value that nature has as of itself, as

Does "intrinsic value" - i.e., the value that nature has as of itself, as opposed to a value for humans - exist? The concept seems like an oxymoron. Nature also has economic values, which include "existence value", being the value that people place on knowing that nature exists even if they never use it. This may be expressed by a hypothetical "willingness to pay" for nature to continue to exist. I am wondering if nature conservation organisations around the world have got the two concepts confused. If so, this would have practical consequences for the way in which funding for conservation is sought.

Read another response by Peter S. Fosl
Read another response about Environment, Value