I believe that Kant defended the "law of cause and effect" by stating this

I believe that Kant defended the "law of cause and effect" by stating this

I believe that Kant defended the "law of cause and effect" by stating this argument: (P) If we didn't understand or acknowledge the law of cause and effect, we couldn't have any knowledge. (Q) We have knowledge. Therefore: (P) we acknowledge the law of cause and effect. Isn't this line of reasoning a fallacy? P implies Q, Q, : P

Read another response by Alexander George, Peter S. Fosl
Read another response about Logic, Philosophers
Print