If there is not any criterion for truth and any methodology for checking

If there is not any criterion for truth and any methodology for checking

If there is not any criterion for truth and any methodology for checking propositions with evidence, why should we consider philosophy as a way to truth? It can be understood as a kind of playing with thought, in spite of searching the truth. It can be classified in a cluster with poker and chess, not with science. Sorry for probable rudeness.

Read another response by Thomas Pogge
Read another response about Philosophy