I know it is considered an abuse of free speech to shout "Fire!" in a crowded theater. But, should it also be considered an abuse of free speech to shout "Satan!" in a crowded fundamentalist church (supposing, for argument's sake, that doing so would engender a similar response)? How much does the universality or non-universality of the mindset of the people affected determine the wrongness of this action? A similar, but more personal situation is that my father, a WWII veteran, suffered from "shell shock" (a type of post-traumatic stress), yet a neighbor thought it amusing to set of loud fireworks not far from our house on Independence Day even after being informed of the distress it caused, and cited his right (probably a speech-related right) to do so. Are we obligated to take into account non-universal mindsets when determining if the right to free speech applies? What properties of certain mindsets in such cases would give them priority over free speech rights? The Danish cartoon case is the current motivation for my asking these questions.