Is it morally wrong to only want to marry someone from your own ethnic group?

What is the best part of life?

How do the philosophers justify war, if they ever do? I ask this question because even the Prophets have fought wars, for their religion. So, how can mortals remain aloof from it?

Does "intrinsic value" - i.e., the value that nature has as of itself, as opposed to a value for humans - exist? The concept seems like an oxymoron. Nature also has economic values, which include "existence value", being the value that people place on knowing that nature exists even if they never use it. This may be expressed by a hypothetical "willingness to pay" for nature to continue to exist. I am wondering if nature conservation organisations around the world have got the two concepts confused. If so, this would have practical consequences for the way in which funding for conservation is sought.

Is medical care or education a basic human right? If so, why? what is a basic human right? Thanks!

If a man held a gun to your head and told you to go downstairs, would you have a choice?

If every distinct mental state has a distinct ("corresponding") physical state, how could we tell which was causing which at any given moment? I'm sure that in certain contexts it would be more practical to answer that the mental state was caused by the physical state (e.g., "P is just irritable because he hasn't eaten"), and that in certain other contexts it would be more practical to answer that the mental state caused the physical (e.g., "P moved his hand because he decided to")--but is there any context-free answer to this question, i.e., the question as to whether the mind controls the body or whether the body controls the mind at any given moment?

Do luck and bad luck exist? Or have they just been imagined in order to create excuses?

If we define the science as the study of reality to find the relations among objects through scientific method, is mathematics a science? Or, it's something like logic which can be used in a wide range of sciences, philosophies, and even daily usages.

If freewill is being the sole author of your actions and there is never a point in life in which you are not influenced (i.e., chemical reaction, previous experience, genetic predisposition, bias, preconceived notions, instinct...), then can one really be the author of their action and exercise free will or is hard determinism the only plausible answer? -Eduardo Alpizar