Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

75
 questions about 
Perception
68
 questions about 
Happiness
151
 questions about 
Existence
70
 questions about 
Truth
96
 questions about 
Time
154
 questions about 
Sex
105
 questions about 
Art
89
 questions about 
Law
221
 questions about 
Value
31
 questions about 
Space
81
 questions about 
Identity
39
 questions about 
Race
58
 questions about 
Abortion
392
 questions about 
Religion
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
88
 questions about 
Physics
58
 questions about 
Punishment
117
 questions about 
Children
69
 questions about 
Business
284
 questions about 
Mind
77
 questions about 
Emotion
80
 questions about 
Death
34
 questions about 
Music
244
 questions about 
Justice
134
 questions about 
Love
287
 questions about 
Language
218
 questions about 
Education
24
 questions about 
Suicide
54
 questions about 
Medicine
27
 questions about 
Gender
110
 questions about 
Biology
170
 questions about 
Freedom
110
 questions about 
Animals
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
23
 questions about 
History
36
 questions about 
Literature
2
 questions about 
Action
2
 questions about 
Culture
51
 questions about 
War
67
 questions about 
Feminism
43
 questions about 
Color
75
 questions about 
Beauty
208
 questions about 
Science
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
32
 questions about 
Sport
124
 questions about 
Profession
374
 questions about 
Logic
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
4
 questions about 
Economics

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.