Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

105
 questions about 
Art
81
 questions about 
Identity
39
 questions about 
Race
374
 questions about 
Logic
154
 questions about 
Sex
51
 questions about 
War
68
 questions about 
Happiness
151
 questions about 
Existence
287
 questions about 
Language
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
36
 questions about 
Literature
221
 questions about 
Value
284
 questions about 
Mind
32
 questions about 
Sport
218
 questions about 
Education
89
 questions about 
Law
75
 questions about 
Beauty
27
 questions about 
Gender
70
 questions about 
Truth
77
 questions about 
Emotion
43
 questions about 
Color
69
 questions about 
Business
67
 questions about 
Feminism
2
 questions about 
Action
23
 questions about 
History
80
 questions about 
Death
54
 questions about 
Medicine
58
 questions about 
Abortion
392
 questions about 
Religion
208
 questions about 
Science
2
 questions about 
Culture
117
 questions about 
Children
58
 questions about 
Punishment
244
 questions about 
Justice
88
 questions about 
Physics
134
 questions about 
Love
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
4
 questions about 
Economics
24
 questions about 
Suicide
110
 questions about 
Animals
110
 questions about 
Biology
31
 questions about 
Space
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
96
 questions about 
Time
124
 questions about 
Profession
75
 questions about 
Perception
170
 questions about 
Freedom
34
 questions about 
Music

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.