Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

24
 questions about 
Suicide
208
 questions about 
Science
151
 questions about 
Existence
392
 questions about 
Religion
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
39
 questions about 
Race
154
 questions about 
Sex
110
 questions about 
Biology
58
 questions about 
Abortion
117
 questions about 
Children
27
 questions about 
Gender
32
 questions about 
Sport
284
 questions about 
Mind
43
 questions about 
Color
34
 questions about 
Music
134
 questions about 
Love
31
 questions about 
Space
70
 questions about 
Truth
51
 questions about 
War
36
 questions about 
Literature
2
 questions about 
Action
170
 questions about 
Freedom
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
105
 questions about 
Art
221
 questions about 
Value
77
 questions about 
Emotion
69
 questions about 
Business
80
 questions about 
Death
110
 questions about 
Animals
75
 questions about 
Perception
54
 questions about 
Medicine
124
 questions about 
Profession
2
 questions about 
Culture
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
89
 questions about 
Law
96
 questions about 
Time
4
 questions about 
Economics
68
 questions about 
Happiness
75
 questions about 
Beauty
244
 questions about 
Justice
81
 questions about 
Identity
88
 questions about 
Physics
58
 questions about 
Punishment
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
374
 questions about 
Logic
218
 questions about 
Education
67
 questions about 
Feminism
23
 questions about 
History
287
 questions about 
Language

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.