Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

23
 questions about 
History
67
 questions about 
Feminism
27
 questions about 
Gender
2
 questions about 
Action
221
 questions about 
Value
134
 questions about 
Love
96
 questions about 
Time
154
 questions about 
Sex
2
 questions about 
Culture
392
 questions about 
Religion
39
 questions about 
Race
69
 questions about 
Business
4
 questions about 
Economics
208
 questions about 
Science
51
 questions about 
War
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
151
 questions about 
Existence
110
 questions about 
Biology
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
287
 questions about 
Language
88
 questions about 
Physics
75
 questions about 
Perception
32
 questions about 
Sport
81
 questions about 
Identity
80
 questions about 
Death
31
 questions about 
Space
284
 questions about 
Mind
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
58
 questions about 
Punishment
124
 questions about 
Profession
75
 questions about 
Beauty
110
 questions about 
Animals
89
 questions about 
Law
77
 questions about 
Emotion
34
 questions about 
Music
70
 questions about 
Truth
244
 questions about 
Justice
36
 questions about 
Literature
54
 questions about 
Medicine
43
 questions about 
Color
170
 questions about 
Freedom
68
 questions about 
Happiness
374
 questions about 
Logic
117
 questions about 
Children
105
 questions about 
Art
58
 questions about 
Abortion
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
218
 questions about 
Education
24
 questions about 
Suicide

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.