Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

68
 questions about 
Happiness
89
 questions about 
Law
244
 questions about 
Justice
80
 questions about 
Death
32
 questions about 
Sport
2
 questions about 
Action
54
 questions about 
Medicine
36
 questions about 
Literature
27
 questions about 
Gender
81
 questions about 
Identity
75
 questions about 
Perception
77
 questions about 
Emotion
208
 questions about 
Science
392
 questions about 
Religion
105
 questions about 
Art
134
 questions about 
Love
75
 questions about 
Beauty
2
 questions about 
Culture
218
 questions about 
Education
88
 questions about 
Physics
67
 questions about 
Feminism
374
 questions about 
Logic
154
 questions about 
Sex
24
 questions about 
Suicide
96
 questions about 
Time
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
287
 questions about 
Language
110
 questions about 
Biology
58
 questions about 
Abortion
58
 questions about 
Punishment
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
39
 questions about 
Race
117
 questions about 
Children
69
 questions about 
Business
221
 questions about 
Value
124
 questions about 
Profession
4
 questions about 
Economics
51
 questions about 
War
34
 questions about 
Music
70
 questions about 
Truth
170
 questions about 
Freedom
284
 questions about 
Mind
23
 questions about 
History
151
 questions about 
Existence
110
 questions about 
Animals
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
43
 questions about 
Color
31
 questions about 
Space

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.