Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

36
 questions about 
Literature
117
 questions about 
Children
88
 questions about 
Physics
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
124
 questions about 
Profession
374
 questions about 
Logic
67
 questions about 
Feminism
110
 questions about 
Animals
75
 questions about 
Perception
81
 questions about 
Identity
96
 questions about 
Time
32
 questions about 
Sport
89
 questions about 
Law
151
 questions about 
Existence
58
 questions about 
Punishment
39
 questions about 
Race
75
 questions about 
Beauty
27
 questions about 
Gender
221
 questions about 
Value
70
 questions about 
Truth
69
 questions about 
Business
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
2
 questions about 
Culture
287
 questions about 
Language
154
 questions about 
Sex
218
 questions about 
Education
284
 questions about 
Mind
31
 questions about 
Space
24
 questions about 
Suicide
134
 questions about 
Love
80
 questions about 
Death
77
 questions about 
Emotion
54
 questions about 
Medicine
2
 questions about 
Action
4
 questions about 
Economics
208
 questions about 
Science
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
23
 questions about 
History
110
 questions about 
Biology
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
58
 questions about 
Abortion
170
 questions about 
Freedom
34
 questions about 
Music
105
 questions about 
Art
68
 questions about 
Happiness
51
 questions about 
War
43
 questions about 
Color
244
 questions about 
Justice
392
 questions about 
Religion

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.