Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

77
 questions about 
Emotion
287
 questions about 
Language
31
 questions about 
Space
36
 questions about 
Literature
374
 questions about 
Logic
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
110
 questions about 
Animals
75
 questions about 
Perception
58
 questions about 
Punishment
134
 questions about 
Love
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
208
 questions about 
Science
70
 questions about 
Truth
244
 questions about 
Justice
43
 questions about 
Color
69
 questions about 
Business
32
 questions about 
Sport
2
 questions about 
Action
34
 questions about 
Music
89
 questions about 
Law
392
 questions about 
Religion
105
 questions about 
Art
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
96
 questions about 
Time
80
 questions about 
Death
68
 questions about 
Happiness
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
58
 questions about 
Abortion
54
 questions about 
Medicine
23
 questions about 
History
81
 questions about 
Identity
67
 questions about 
Feminism
27
 questions about 
Gender
284
 questions about 
Mind
24
 questions about 
Suicide
151
 questions about 
Existence
51
 questions about 
War
88
 questions about 
Physics
75
 questions about 
Beauty
117
 questions about 
Children
2
 questions about 
Culture
4
 questions about 
Economics
170
 questions about 
Freedom
221
 questions about 
Value
218
 questions about 
Education
124
 questions about 
Profession
154
 questions about 
Sex
39
 questions about 
Race
110
 questions about 
Biology

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.