Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

124
 questions about 
Profession
208
 questions about 
Science
23
 questions about 
History
58
 questions about 
Abortion
4
 questions about 
Economics
134
 questions about 
Love
218
 questions about 
Education
32
 questions about 
Sport
374
 questions about 
Logic
70
 questions about 
Truth
287
 questions about 
Language
36
 questions about 
Literature
27
 questions about 
Gender
81
 questions about 
Identity
31
 questions about 
Space
151
 questions about 
Existence
2
 questions about 
Culture
68
 questions about 
Happiness
77
 questions about 
Emotion
69
 questions about 
Business
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
43
 questions about 
Color
80
 questions about 
Death
96
 questions about 
Time
88
 questions about 
Physics
58
 questions about 
Punishment
284
 questions about 
Mind
110
 questions about 
Biology
154
 questions about 
Sex
105
 questions about 
Art
221
 questions about 
Value
39
 questions about 
Race
67
 questions about 
Feminism
2
 questions about 
Action
110
 questions about 
Animals
392
 questions about 
Religion
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
51
 questions about 
War
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
170
 questions about 
Freedom
117
 questions about 
Children
34
 questions about 
Music
244
 questions about 
Justice
75
 questions about 
Perception
75
 questions about 
Beauty
89
 questions about 
Law
54
 questions about 
Medicine
24
 questions about 
Suicide
282
 questions about 
Knowledge

ask a question

recent responses

all topics

info

⚲

Question of the Day

Hello! I'd like to ask about syllogisms. I have a particular problem when understanding this certain syllogism: Some girls are single. Some girls are sad. Therefore, some girls are single and sad. While I think it is valid, I cannot fully make an accurate explanation as to why it is. Hoping somebody could help me. Thanks!

The syllogism in question is not valid. Nothing logically guarantees that the set of single girls and the set of sad girls overlap. Even if both sets have members, it does not follow that they have any members in common. Compare: Some polygons are squares. Some polygons are triangles. But it is false that some polygons are square triangles.