Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

67
 questions about 
Feminism
218
 questions about 
Education
105
 questions about 
Art
88
 questions about 
Physics
32
 questions about 
Sport
68
 questions about 
Happiness
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
154
 questions about 
Sex
2
 questions about 
Action
208
 questions about 
Science
51
 questions about 
War
36
 questions about 
Literature
244
 questions about 
Justice
134
 questions about 
Love
39
 questions about 
Race
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
287
 questions about 
Language
31
 questions about 
Space
170
 questions about 
Freedom
34
 questions about 
Music
221
 questions about 
Value
110
 questions about 
Biology
43
 questions about 
Color
2
 questions about 
Culture
124
 questions about 
Profession
96
 questions about 
Time
75
 questions about 
Perception
77
 questions about 
Emotion
54
 questions about 
Medicine
117
 questions about 
Children
81
 questions about 
Identity
110
 questions about 
Animals
70
 questions about 
Truth
24
 questions about 
Suicide
374
 questions about 
Logic
392
 questions about 
Religion
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
27
 questions about 
Gender
75
 questions about 
Beauty
69
 questions about 
Business
284
 questions about 
Mind
23
 questions about 
History
58
 questions about 
Abortion
80
 questions about 
Death
89
 questions about 
Law
4
 questions about 
Economics
58
 questions about 
Punishment
151
 questions about 
Existence

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.