Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

39
 questions about 
Race
151
 questions about 
Existence
110
 questions about 
Animals
374
 questions about 
Logic
110
 questions about 
Biology
2
 questions about 
Action
75
 questions about 
Beauty
221
 questions about 
Value
58
 questions about 
Punishment
88
 questions about 
Physics
77
 questions about 
Emotion
154
 questions about 
Sex
81
 questions about 
Identity
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
31
 questions about 
Space
218
 questions about 
Education
134
 questions about 
Love
208
 questions about 
Science
69
 questions about 
Business
96
 questions about 
Time
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
68
 questions about 
Happiness
2
 questions about 
Culture
4
 questions about 
Economics
89
 questions about 
Law
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
43
 questions about 
Color
70
 questions about 
Truth
287
 questions about 
Language
36
 questions about 
Literature
80
 questions about 
Death
170
 questions about 
Freedom
75
 questions about 
Perception
32
 questions about 
Sport
27
 questions about 
Gender
58
 questions about 
Abortion
244
 questions about 
Justice
51
 questions about 
War
284
 questions about 
Mind
392
 questions about 
Religion
34
 questions about 
Music
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
23
 questions about 
History
117
 questions about 
Children
105
 questions about 
Art
54
 questions about 
Medicine
67
 questions about 
Feminism
124
 questions about 
Profession
24
 questions about 
Suicide

ask a question

recent responses

all topics

info

⚲

Question of the Day

Hello! I'd like to ask about syllogisms. I have a particular problem when understanding this certain syllogism: Some girls are single. Some girls are sad. Therefore, some girls are single and sad. While I think it is valid, I cannot fully make an accurate explanation as to why it is. Hoping somebody could help me. Thanks!

The syllogism in question is not valid. Nothing logically guarantees that the set of single girls and the set of sad girls overlap. Even if both sets have members, it does not follow that they have any members in common. Compare: Some polygons are squares. Some polygons are triangles. But it is false that some polygons are square triangles.