Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

24
 questions about 
Suicide
51
 questions about 
War
31
 questions about 
Space
221
 questions about 
Value
151
 questions about 
Existence
70
 questions about 
Truth
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
58
 questions about 
Abortion
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
105
 questions about 
Art
208
 questions about 
Science
96
 questions about 
Time
89
 questions about 
Law
32
 questions about 
Sport
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
117
 questions about 
Children
80
 questions about 
Death
43
 questions about 
Color
69
 questions about 
Business
244
 questions about 
Justice
134
 questions about 
Love
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
110
 questions about 
Animals
27
 questions about 
Gender
284
 questions about 
Mind
54
 questions about 
Medicine
124
 questions about 
Profession
170
 questions about 
Freedom
88
 questions about 
Physics
68
 questions about 
Happiness
75
 questions about 
Beauty
75
 questions about 
Perception
218
 questions about 
Education
154
 questions about 
Sex
287
 questions about 
Language
23
 questions about 
History
67
 questions about 
Feminism
392
 questions about 
Religion
374
 questions about 
Logic
34
 questions about 
Music
2
 questions about 
Culture
110
 questions about 
Biology
39
 questions about 
Race
58
 questions about 
Punishment
36
 questions about 
Literature
77
 questions about 
Emotion
4
 questions about 
Economics
81
 questions about 
Identity
2
 questions about 
Action

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.