Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

221
 questions about 
Value
80
 questions about 
Death
110
 questions about 
Biology
2
 questions about 
Culture
34
 questions about 
Music
244
 questions about 
Justice
81
 questions about 
Identity
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
77
 questions about 
Emotion
75
 questions about 
Beauty
170
 questions about 
Freedom
124
 questions about 
Profession
69
 questions about 
Business
75
 questions about 
Perception
51
 questions about 
War
392
 questions about 
Religion
32
 questions about 
Sport
39
 questions about 
Race
27
 questions about 
Gender
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
110
 questions about 
Animals
70
 questions about 
Truth
117
 questions about 
Children
58
 questions about 
Abortion
36
 questions about 
Literature
134
 questions about 
Love
151
 questions about 
Existence
67
 questions about 
Feminism
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
2
 questions about 
Action
374
 questions about 
Logic
24
 questions about 
Suicide
208
 questions about 
Science
287
 questions about 
Language
68
 questions about 
Happiness
58
 questions about 
Punishment
89
 questions about 
Law
43
 questions about 
Color
105
 questions about 
Art
23
 questions about 
History
218
 questions about 
Education
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
31
 questions about 
Space
96
 questions about 
Time
54
 questions about 
Medicine
154
 questions about 
Sex
88
 questions about 
Physics
284
 questions about 
Mind
4
 questions about 
Economics

Question of the Day

The syllogism in question is not valid. Nothing logically guarantees that the set of single girls and the set of sad girls overlap. Even if both sets have members, it does not follow that they have any members in common. Compare: Some polygons are squares. Some polygons are triangles. But it is false that some polygons are square triangles.