Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

117
 questions about 
Children
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
24
 questions about 
Suicide
110
 questions about 
Biology
110
 questions about 
Animals
221
 questions about 
Value
39
 questions about 
Race
51
 questions about 
War
23
 questions about 
History
170
 questions about 
Freedom
69
 questions about 
Business
70
 questions about 
Truth
43
 questions about 
Color
67
 questions about 
Feminism
27
 questions about 
Gender
208
 questions about 
Science
154
 questions about 
Sex
80
 questions about 
Death
54
 questions about 
Medicine
75
 questions about 
Beauty
374
 questions about 
Logic
287
 questions about 
Language
151
 questions about 
Existence
218
 questions about 
Education
36
 questions about 
Literature
2
 questions about 
Culture
75
 questions about 
Perception
124
 questions about 
Profession
4
 questions about 
Economics
34
 questions about 
Music
2
 questions about 
Action
88
 questions about 
Physics
244
 questions about 
Justice
77
 questions about 
Emotion
81
 questions about 
Identity
96
 questions about 
Time
134
 questions about 
Love
284
 questions about 
Mind
58
 questions about 
Punishment
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
392
 questions about 
Religion
31
 questions about 
Space
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
68
 questions about 
Happiness
58
 questions about 
Abortion
32
 questions about 
Sport
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
89
 questions about 
Law
105
 questions about 
Art

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.