Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

110
 questions about 
Animals
68
 questions about 
Happiness
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
218
 questions about 
Education
34
 questions about 
Music
75
 questions about 
Perception
75
 questions about 
Beauty
81
 questions about 
Identity
4
 questions about 
Economics
374
 questions about 
Logic
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
287
 questions about 
Language
105
 questions about 
Art
39
 questions about 
Race
51
 questions about 
War
58
 questions about 
Abortion
24
 questions about 
Suicide
124
 questions about 
Profession
67
 questions about 
Feminism
36
 questions about 
Literature
170
 questions about 
Freedom
284
 questions about 
Mind
43
 questions about 
Color
208
 questions about 
Science
2
 questions about 
Culture
58
 questions about 
Punishment
151
 questions about 
Existence
117
 questions about 
Children
221
 questions about 
Value
89
 questions about 
Law
134
 questions about 
Love
244
 questions about 
Justice
23
 questions about 
History
154
 questions about 
Sex
54
 questions about 
Medicine
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
88
 questions about 
Physics
69
 questions about 
Business
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
110
 questions about 
Biology
32
 questions about 
Sport
392
 questions about 
Religion
77
 questions about 
Emotion
27
 questions about 
Gender
70
 questions about 
Truth
80
 questions about 
Death
96
 questions about 
Time
31
 questions about 
Space
2
 questions about 
Action

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.