Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

88
 questions about 
Physics
75
 questions about 
Perception
2
 questions about 
Culture
4
 questions about 
Economics
110
 questions about 
Biology
105
 questions about 
Art
244
 questions about 
Justice
110
 questions about 
Animals
208
 questions about 
Science
151
 questions about 
Existence
2
 questions about 
Action
68
 questions about 
Happiness
51
 questions about 
War
75
 questions about 
Beauty
31
 questions about 
Space
96
 questions about 
Time
154
 questions about 
Sex
81
 questions about 
Identity
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
34
 questions about 
Music
54
 questions about 
Medicine
170
 questions about 
Freedom
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
70
 questions about 
Truth
77
 questions about 
Emotion
43
 questions about 
Color
124
 questions about 
Profession
32
 questions about 
Sport
221
 questions about 
Value
117
 questions about 
Children
374
 questions about 
Logic
392
 questions about 
Religion
39
 questions about 
Race
23
 questions about 
History
80
 questions about 
Death
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
89
 questions about 
Law
58
 questions about 
Abortion
36
 questions about 
Literature
284
 questions about 
Mind
218
 questions about 
Education
69
 questions about 
Business
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
24
 questions about 
Suicide
134
 questions about 
Love
67
 questions about 
Feminism
58
 questions about 
Punishment
27
 questions about 
Gender
287
 questions about 
Language

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.