Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

170
 questions about 
Freedom
77
 questions about 
Emotion
81
 questions about 
Identity
110
 questions about 
Animals
75
 questions about 
Perception
105
 questions about 
Art
117
 questions about 
Children
287
 questions about 
Language
221
 questions about 
Value
110
 questions about 
Biology
134
 questions about 
Love
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
124
 questions about 
Profession
54
 questions about 
Medicine
96
 questions about 
Time
68
 questions about 
Happiness
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
374
 questions about 
Logic
27
 questions about 
Gender
244
 questions about 
Justice
75
 questions about 
Beauty
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
23
 questions about 
History
31
 questions about 
Space
88
 questions about 
Physics
284
 questions about 
Mind
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
70
 questions about 
Truth
39
 questions about 
Race
67
 questions about 
Feminism
218
 questions about 
Education
32
 questions about 
Sport
58
 questions about 
Punishment
2
 questions about 
Culture
36
 questions about 
Literature
151
 questions about 
Existence
34
 questions about 
Music
2
 questions about 
Action
80
 questions about 
Death
43
 questions about 
Color
24
 questions about 
Suicide
154
 questions about 
Sex
58
 questions about 
Abortion
69
 questions about 
Business
208
 questions about 
Science
392
 questions about 
Religion
51
 questions about 
War
4
 questions about 
Economics
89
 questions about 
Law

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.