Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

96
 questions about 
Time
151
 questions about 
Existence
51
 questions about 
War
208
 questions about 
Science
221
 questions about 
Value
43
 questions about 
Color
287
 questions about 
Language
75
 questions about 
Perception
392
 questions about 
Religion
68
 questions about 
Happiness
374
 questions about 
Logic
124
 questions about 
Profession
134
 questions about 
Love
110
 questions about 
Animals
34
 questions about 
Music
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
27
 questions about 
Gender
81
 questions about 
Identity
69
 questions about 
Business
70
 questions about 
Truth
218
 questions about 
Education
105
 questions about 
Art
117
 questions about 
Children
54
 questions about 
Medicine
244
 questions about 
Justice
31
 questions about 
Space
39
 questions about 
Race
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
2
 questions about 
Action
24
 questions about 
Suicide
89
 questions about 
Law
36
 questions about 
Literature
32
 questions about 
Sport
75
 questions about 
Beauty
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
4
 questions about 
Economics
88
 questions about 
Physics
284
 questions about 
Mind
80
 questions about 
Death
23
 questions about 
History
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
58
 questions about 
Punishment
58
 questions about 
Abortion
170
 questions about 
Freedom
110
 questions about 
Biology
154
 questions about 
Sex
77
 questions about 
Emotion
67
 questions about 
Feminism
2
 questions about 
Culture

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.