Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

151
 questions about 
Existence
244
 questions about 
Justice
208
 questions about 
Science
88
 questions about 
Physics
75
 questions about 
Perception
58
 questions about 
Abortion
105
 questions about 
Art
69
 questions about 
Business
392
 questions about 
Religion
117
 questions about 
Children
39
 questions about 
Race
2
 questions about 
Action
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
58
 questions about 
Punishment
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
77
 questions about 
Emotion
34
 questions about 
Music
221
 questions about 
Value
170
 questions about 
Freedom
96
 questions about 
Time
2
 questions about 
Culture
218
 questions about 
Education
24
 questions about 
Suicide
80
 questions about 
Death
67
 questions about 
Feminism
54
 questions about 
Medicine
134
 questions about 
Love
23
 questions about 
History
124
 questions about 
Profession
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
31
 questions about 
Space
36
 questions about 
Literature
43
 questions about 
Color
75
 questions about 
Beauty
27
 questions about 
Gender
32
 questions about 
Sport
374
 questions about 
Logic
154
 questions about 
Sex
70
 questions about 
Truth
287
 questions about 
Language
89
 questions about 
Law
110
 questions about 
Biology
51
 questions about 
War
68
 questions about 
Happiness
81
 questions about 
Identity
4
 questions about 
Economics
284
 questions about 
Mind
110
 questions about 
Animals

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.