Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

77
 questions about 
Emotion
117
 questions about 
Children
218
 questions about 
Education
124
 questions about 
Profession
96
 questions about 
Time
81
 questions about 
Identity
392
 questions about 
Religion
89
 questions about 
Law
58
 questions about 
Abortion
58
 questions about 
Punishment
110
 questions about 
Biology
51
 questions about 
War
170
 questions about 
Freedom
151
 questions about 
Existence
287
 questions about 
Language
34
 questions about 
Music
2
 questions about 
Action
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
105
 questions about 
Art
134
 questions about 
Love
374
 questions about 
Logic
4
 questions about 
Economics
67
 questions about 
Feminism
75
 questions about 
Beauty
68
 questions about 
Happiness
110
 questions about 
Animals
39
 questions about 
Race
69
 questions about 
Business
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
43
 questions about 
Color
36
 questions about 
Literature
154
 questions about 
Sex
75
 questions about 
Perception
221
 questions about 
Value
2
 questions about 
Culture
80
 questions about 
Death
32
 questions about 
Sport
284
 questions about 
Mind
244
 questions about 
Justice
88
 questions about 
Physics
54
 questions about 
Medicine
24
 questions about 
Suicide
27
 questions about 
Gender
31
 questions about 
Space
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
23
 questions about 
History
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
208
 questions about 
Science
70
 questions about 
Truth

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.