Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

110
 questions about 
Biology
151
 questions about 
Existence
284
 questions about 
Mind
36
 questions about 
Literature
54
 questions about 
Medicine
68
 questions about 
Happiness
2
 questions about 
Culture
117
 questions about 
Children
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
31
 questions about 
Space
81
 questions about 
Identity
218
 questions about 
Education
43
 questions about 
Color
32
 questions about 
Sport
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
80
 questions about 
Death
208
 questions about 
Science
134
 questions about 
Love
110
 questions about 
Animals
75
 questions about 
Beauty
244
 questions about 
Justice
392
 questions about 
Religion
2
 questions about 
Action
88
 questions about 
Physics
89
 questions about 
Law
287
 questions about 
Language
221
 questions about 
Value
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
75
 questions about 
Perception
58
 questions about 
Punishment
69
 questions about 
Business
39
 questions about 
Race
58
 questions about 
Abortion
4
 questions about 
Economics
23
 questions about 
History
154
 questions about 
Sex
374
 questions about 
Logic
77
 questions about 
Emotion
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
105
 questions about 
Art
67
 questions about 
Feminism
96
 questions about 
Time
124
 questions about 
Profession
170
 questions about 
Freedom
51
 questions about 
War
27
 questions about 
Gender
34
 questions about 
Music
70
 questions about 
Truth
24
 questions about 
Suicide

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.