Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
88
 questions about 
Physics
24
 questions about 
Suicide
4
 questions about 
Economics
124
 questions about 
Profession
23
 questions about 
History
221
 questions about 
Value
208
 questions about 
Science
244
 questions about 
Justice
27
 questions about 
Gender
2
 questions about 
Culture
154
 questions about 
Sex
43
 questions about 
Color
284
 questions about 
Mind
117
 questions about 
Children
110
 questions about 
Biology
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
105
 questions about 
Art
32
 questions about 
Sport
151
 questions about 
Existence
89
 questions about 
Law
170
 questions about 
Freedom
81
 questions about 
Identity
80
 questions about 
Death
392
 questions about 
Religion
39
 questions about 
Race
134
 questions about 
Love
54
 questions about 
Medicine
2
 questions about 
Action
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
70
 questions about 
Truth
34
 questions about 
Music
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
75
 questions about 
Beauty
75
 questions about 
Perception
77
 questions about 
Emotion
96
 questions about 
Time
58
 questions about 
Abortion
68
 questions about 
Happiness
218
 questions about 
Education
58
 questions about 
Punishment
67
 questions about 
Feminism
374
 questions about 
Logic
110
 questions about 
Animals
31
 questions about 
Space
36
 questions about 
Literature
69
 questions about 
Business
51
 questions about 
War
287
 questions about 
Language

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.