Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

23
 questions about 
History
110
 questions about 
Animals
39
 questions about 
Race
77
 questions about 
Emotion
284
 questions about 
Mind
2
 questions about 
Action
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
58
 questions about 
Abortion
221
 questions about 
Value
34
 questions about 
Music
36
 questions about 
Literature
24
 questions about 
Suicide
67
 questions about 
Feminism
117
 questions about 
Children
134
 questions about 
Love
287
 questions about 
Language
208
 questions about 
Science
54
 questions about 
Medicine
88
 questions about 
Physics
89
 questions about 
Law
392
 questions about 
Religion
96
 questions about 
Time
75
 questions about 
Beauty
244
 questions about 
Justice
154
 questions about 
Sex
110
 questions about 
Biology
69
 questions about 
Business
32
 questions about 
Sport
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
31
 questions about 
Space
81
 questions about 
Identity
105
 questions about 
Art
218
 questions about 
Education
68
 questions about 
Happiness
70
 questions about 
Truth
43
 questions about 
Color
374
 questions about 
Logic
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
2
 questions about 
Culture
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
151
 questions about 
Existence
4
 questions about 
Economics
124
 questions about 
Profession
80
 questions about 
Death
51
 questions about 
War
75
 questions about 
Perception
27
 questions about 
Gender
58
 questions about 
Punishment
170
 questions about 
Freedom

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.