Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

2
 questions about 
Action
27
 questions about 
Gender
244
 questions about 
Justice
151
 questions about 
Existence
77
 questions about 
Emotion
54
 questions about 
Medicine
117
 questions about 
Children
75
 questions about 
Perception
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
80
 questions about 
Death
4
 questions about 
Economics
96
 questions about 
Time
81
 questions about 
Identity
392
 questions about 
Religion
39
 questions about 
Race
34
 questions about 
Music
88
 questions about 
Physics
170
 questions about 
Freedom
374
 questions about 
Logic
221
 questions about 
Value
58
 questions about 
Punishment
105
 questions about 
Art
218
 questions about 
Education
110
 questions about 
Biology
31
 questions about 
Space
51
 questions about 
War
75
 questions about 
Beauty
70
 questions about 
Truth
110
 questions about 
Animals
67
 questions about 
Feminism
32
 questions about 
Sport
124
 questions about 
Profession
208
 questions about 
Science
154
 questions about 
Sex
68
 questions about 
Happiness
58
 questions about 
Abortion
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
36
 questions about 
Literature
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
43
 questions about 
Color
24
 questions about 
Suicide
89
 questions about 
Law
287
 questions about 
Language
134
 questions about 
Love
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
23
 questions about 
History
284
 questions about 
Mind
2
 questions about 
Culture
69
 questions about 
Business

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.