Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

70
 questions about 
Truth
117
 questions about 
Children
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
284
 questions about 
Mind
77
 questions about 
Emotion
287
 questions about 
Language
58
 questions about 
Punishment
24
 questions about 
Suicide
39
 questions about 
Race
2
 questions about 
Culture
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
69
 questions about 
Business
374
 questions about 
Logic
58
 questions about 
Abortion
88
 questions about 
Physics
151
 questions about 
Existence
110
 questions about 
Biology
31
 questions about 
Space
154
 questions about 
Sex
81
 questions about 
Identity
43
 questions about 
Color
36
 questions about 
Literature
2
 questions about 
Action
67
 questions about 
Feminism
218
 questions about 
Education
32
 questions about 
Sport
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
96
 questions about 
Time
170
 questions about 
Freedom
105
 questions about 
Art
392
 questions about 
Religion
134
 questions about 
Love
80
 questions about 
Death
89
 questions about 
Law
27
 questions about 
Gender
23
 questions about 
History
124
 questions about 
Profession
68
 questions about 
Happiness
34
 questions about 
Music
54
 questions about 
Medicine
244
 questions about 
Justice
51
 questions about 
War
110
 questions about 
Animals
75
 questions about 
Beauty
208
 questions about 
Science
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
75
 questions about 
Perception
4
 questions about 
Economics
221
 questions about 
Value

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.