Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

4
 questions about 
Economics
34
 questions about 
Music
2
 questions about 
Action
67
 questions about 
Feminism
392
 questions about 
Religion
31
 questions about 
Space
151
 questions about 
Existence
70
 questions about 
Truth
244
 questions about 
Justice
77
 questions about 
Emotion
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
374
 questions about 
Logic
54
 questions about 
Medicine
36
 questions about 
Literature
39
 questions about 
Race
105
 questions about 
Art
110
 questions about 
Animals
75
 questions about 
Perception
89
 questions about 
Law
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
58
 questions about 
Punishment
96
 questions about 
Time
68
 questions about 
Happiness
134
 questions about 
Love
43
 questions about 
Color
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
51
 questions about 
War
124
 questions about 
Profession
75
 questions about 
Beauty
24
 questions about 
Suicide
23
 questions about 
History
221
 questions about 
Value
58
 questions about 
Abortion
218
 questions about 
Education
117
 questions about 
Children
88
 questions about 
Physics
110
 questions about 
Biology
287
 questions about 
Language
27
 questions about 
Gender
170
 questions about 
Freedom
81
 questions about 
Identity
32
 questions about 
Sport
80
 questions about 
Death
208
 questions about 
Science
284
 questions about 
Mind
154
 questions about 
Sex
69
 questions about 
Business
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
2
 questions about 
Culture

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.