Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

244
 questions about 
Justice
43
 questions about 
Color
134
 questions about 
Love
70
 questions about 
Truth
105
 questions about 
Art
68
 questions about 
Happiness
81
 questions about 
Identity
77
 questions about 
Emotion
124
 questions about 
Profession
218
 questions about 
Education
51
 questions about 
War
110
 questions about 
Biology
31
 questions about 
Space
154
 questions about 
Sex
110
 questions about 
Animals
36
 questions about 
Literature
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
34
 questions about 
Music
23
 questions about 
History
4
 questions about 
Economics
208
 questions about 
Science
54
 questions about 
Medicine
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
2
 questions about 
Action
58
 questions about 
Punishment
69
 questions about 
Business
96
 questions about 
Time
32
 questions about 
Sport
27
 questions about 
Gender
67
 questions about 
Feminism
372
 questions about 
Logic
58
 questions about 
Abortion
89
 questions about 
Law
39
 questions about 
Race
151
 questions about 
Existence
117
 questions about 
Children
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
24
 questions about 
Suicide
170
 questions about 
Freedom
80
 questions about 
Death
392
 questions about 
Religion
88
 questions about 
Physics
221
 questions about 
Value
283
 questions about 
Mind
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
75
 questions about 
Perception
75
 questions about 
Beauty
287
 questions about 
Language
2
 questions about 
Culture

Question of the Day

As it stands, your question contains some crucial ambiguities. You ask about a case where more As are observed in group X than in group Y, but it's really not clear what "observed" means here. Do you mean that quite literally, more things that are A have been, so to speak, counted in group X? And if so, were the observations random? That is: did each thing in X have an equal chance of being observed?

And then there's the question of how large the subsets we take are. I assume you mean them to be equal, but you don't say and it matters a lot. If you do, mean equal size samples, are they random? That matters too. And consider this: suppose group X contains far more objects than Y. Of the 10,000 objects in X, 100 are A. Of the 20 objects in Y, 18 are A. Suppose we take a random sample of 10 from each set. Though I'm not going to work through the details, even though there are far more As in X than in Y, the random sample from Y is likely to contain more As than the same-size random sample from X.

The real point is this: probability questions do not have answers unless they are posed precisely. As it stands, the probability question you've posed does not have an answer.