Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

133
 questions about 
Love
81
 questions about 
Identity
43
 questions about 
Color
31
 questions about 
Space
27
 questions about 
Gender
58
 questions about 
Abortion
74
 questions about 
Beauty
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
104
 questions about 
Art
151
 questions about 
Existence
107
 questions about 
Animals
110
 questions about 
Biology
280
 questions about 
Mind
4
 questions about 
Economics
51
 questions about 
War
36
 questions about 
Literature
115
 questions about 
Children
2
 questions about 
Action
284
 questions about 
Language
67
 questions about 
Truth
570
 questions about 
Philosophy
32
 questions about 
Sport
23
 questions about 
History
124
 questions about 
Profession
1267
 questions about 
Ethics
216
 questions about 
Education
2
 questions about 
Culture
79
 questions about 
Death
166
 questions about 
Freedom
58
 questions about 
Punishment
67
 questions about 
Feminism
219
 questions about 
Value
34
 questions about 
Music
75
 questions about 
Perception
153
 questions about 
Sex
38
 questions about 
Race
96
 questions about 
Time
68
 questions about 
Happiness
364
 questions about 
Logic
69
 questions about 
Business
24
 questions about 
Suicide
77
 questions about 
Emotion
389
 questions about 
Religion
243
 questions about 
Justice
208
 questions about 
Science
87
 questions about 
Law
54
 questions about 
Medicine
88
 questions about 
Physics
282
 questions about 
Knowledge

Question of the Day

If there is a paradox here, I don't think it will have anything to do with a conflict in the conditions for set membership. Let's leave aside that there may be sorites-style paradoxes arising from the vagueness of the predicates "young girl" and even "female human." I suspect that those paradoxes can be solved in the "epistemicist" way (see this link).

One and the same individual can possess various mutually consistent properties: she can be a young girl (at a specified time t), a female human being (at any time during her existence, including at time t), and so on. So Miss X can belong to the set of girls who are young at t, the set of female human beings, the set of human beings, the set of mammals, the set of things referred to by you in your question above, etc. She would belong to each of those different sets for different but compatible reasons. I don't see anything paradoxical about that.