Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

282
 questions about 
Knowledge
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
218
 questions about 
Education
32
 questions about 
Sport
36
 questions about 
Literature
24
 questions about 
Suicide
31
 questions about 
Space
287
 questions about 
Language
4
 questions about 
Economics
154
 questions about 
Sex
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
51
 questions about 
War
69
 questions about 
Business
117
 questions about 
Children
81
 questions about 
Identity
110
 questions about 
Biology
27
 questions about 
Gender
96
 questions about 
Time
75
 questions about 
Perception
70
 questions about 
Truth
39
 questions about 
Race
58
 questions about 
Abortion
43
 questions about 
Color
110
 questions about 
Animals
68
 questions about 
Happiness
77
 questions about 
Emotion
2
 questions about 
Action
208
 questions about 
Science
34
 questions about 
Music
151
 questions about 
Existence
134
 questions about 
Love
58
 questions about 
Punishment
124
 questions about 
Profession
170
 questions about 
Freedom
67
 questions about 
Feminism
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
23
 questions about 
History
75
 questions about 
Beauty
374
 questions about 
Logic
221
 questions about 
Value
105
 questions about 
Art
2
 questions about 
Culture
284
 questions about 
Mind
89
 questions about 
Law
88
 questions about 
Physics
244
 questions about 
Justice
392
 questions about 
Religion
80
 questions about 
Death
54
 questions about 
Medicine

ask a question

recent responses

all topics

info

⚲

Question of the Day

Hello! I'd like to ask about syllogisms. I have a particular problem when understanding this certain syllogism: Some girls are single. Some girls are sad. Therefore, some girls are single and sad. While I think it is valid, I cannot fully make an accurate explanation as to why it is. Hoping somebody could help me. Thanks!

The syllogism in question is not valid. Nothing logically guarantees that the set of single girls and the set of sad girls overlap. Even if both sets have members, it does not follow that they have any members in common. Compare: Some polygons are squares. Some polygons are triangles. But it is false that some polygons are square triangles.