Is "doing" philosophy a series of back and forth arguments? If so, then just who

Is "doing" philosophy a series of back and forth arguments? If so, then just who

Is "doing" philosophy a series of back and forth arguments? If so, then just who is the jury that decides? If a group of experienced analytic professors debates one Ayn Rand follower with no academic training, and repeated population samples find the Randian more convincing, then just who is right?

Read another response by Stephen Maitzen
Read another response about Philosophy
Print