The AskPhilosophers logo.

Ethics

Is consequentialism utilitarianism?
Accepted:
April 3, 2018

Comments

The usual way of

Michael Cholbi
April 12, 2018 (changed April 12, 2018) Permalink

The usual way of understanding their relation is that utilitarianism is a version of consequentialism. Consequentialism holds that the only facts about an action that matter to whether the act is morally permissible, etc., are facts about the acts' consequences — roughly, how good an act's consequences are. Utilitarianism offers an account of the relevant good, namely, well-being or happiness, so that, according to utilitarians, the only facts about an action that matter to whether the act is morally permissible, etc., are facts about the acts' consequences for well-being or happiness. (Note that it is possible to be a consequentialist without being a utiltiarian: so long as one holds that there are consequences of an act unrelated to its consequences for well-being or happiness that matter to whether the act is morally permissible, etc.)

  • Log in to post comments
Source URL: https://askphilosophers.org/question/27240
© 2005-2025 AskPhilosophers.org