The AskPhilosophers logo.

War

In America, many people join the military as a means to socio-economic advancement (e.g. in order to pay for college). Is this ethically defensible? Is there any difference between someone who enlists for career advancement and a mercenary?
Accepted:
August 22, 2016

Comments

Consider two people who join

Allen Stairs
August 25, 2016 (changed August 25, 2016) Permalink

Consider two people who join the military.

Person A's motive is socio-economic advancement. Joining the military seems the best path to a good career. But s/he also accepts the country's values, thinks the country needs a military, and thinks that being in the military is an honorable profession. S/he would not join the military of any other country that might possibly be unfriendly to her/his own country.

Person A's motive is likewise socio-economic advancement. S/he doesn't care about the country's values, is not interested in the question of whether the country should or shouldn't have a military, and doesn't care about whether being in the military is honorable. S/he would join the military of any country whatever provided it was advantageous enough to do so.

I believe that there are many people who join the military whose reasons are like Person A's. But I think there's a pretty clear moral difference between the motives of A and B.

Now of course there are also people who join the military mainly out of patriotism and a sense of duty. Some may think such people are more admirable than Person A, and that may be true. But even if it is, it doesn't follow that people like A are acting immorally or dishonorably and I don't see any reason to think they are.

  • Log in to post comments
Source URL: https://askphilosophers.org/question/25726
© 2005-2025 AskPhilosophers.org