The AskPhilosophers logo.

Philosophers

Hello, i was recently in a discussion regarding Kant's moral duties, and whether Kant would follow society's laws before following the duties derived from ethics. If a law in a society state "that it's a righteous sanction to torture another human being if this has broken the law", would Kant say; follow that law!. Or would he point out that his moral laws is dissimilar to that of human society? My argumentation rested on the relativity of cross-cultural law-systems, and thus, the universality of Kant's Maxims.
Accepted:
April 4, 2014

Comments

Oliver Leaman
April 18, 2014 (changed April 18, 2014) Permalink

For Kant the key issue is whether a maxim can be universalized. If it can it is something we ought to act on, if not then not. We have a clear criterion then of when we should morally observe a state law. Can a maxim based on it be universalized?

  • Log in to post comments
Source URL: https://askphilosophers.org/question/5539
© 2005-2025 AskPhilosophers.org