The AskPhilosophers logo.

Ethics

My question involves "moral truths" or "ethical truths." I struggle to see how anyone could claim that a moral proposition is either true or false. By calling something either right or wrong are we simply expressing our feelings on the matter? Those that I've heard defend the proposition that there are moral truths seem to try a bit of "bait and switch." To claim that moral truths exist is to claim that something is true about the world. However in defense of the proposition it seems that defenders of moral truths state something similar to "the truth of this proposition is equivalent to how it works in the world" using a James style of pragmatism.
Accepted:
August 22, 2013

Comments

Stephen Maitzen
August 22, 2013 (changed August 22, 2013) Permalink

In my experience anyway, defenders of the existence of objective moral truths don't typically rely on a James-style pragmatist theory of truth. Have a look at the SEP entry on "Moral Realism," available here. The author is someone who accepts the existence of objective moral truths (unless I'm very much mistaken!), and he doesn't mention James or pragmatism even once.

  • Log in to post comments
Source URL: https://askphilosophers.org/question/5325
© 2005-2025 AskPhilosophers.org