The AskPhilosophers logo.

Emotion

I cannot remember the last time I was unhappy, annoyed or felt jealous. I have read, on some of the answers, references to emotional pain being inevitable. I do not agree. I think it is very possible, but difficult, for one to learn how not to feel 'destructive' emotions, such as anger, jealousy and unhappiness. If one were to, for instance, lose a friend in a 'tragic' accident, they would be expected to feel upset. I think it's correct to say that this is an illogical feeling; an unfortunate bi-product of the way that we have evolved. I think that if one were to be extremely logical, then they would be able to override the emotions, in the same way that many people can override the nefarious feeling of jealousy, if their spouse seemed to be attracted to another person. So, with that context, my question is: Do you think/agree it is possible, or even logical, to live one's life without feeling negative emotions?
Accepted:
July 12, 2012

Comments

Allen Stairs
July 12, 2012 (changed July 12, 2012) Permalink

Whether it's possible is an empirical question. I'd guess it's highly unusual, but it might be so sometimes for all that.

As for whether it's "logical" to live without negative emotions strikes me as not the best question. What I'd ask is whether it's desirable—whether it's a good thing. I don't quite see why it would be, at least given what we're actually like.

Suppose my friend is seriously ill and in pain. Feeling bad about that seems appropriate. If I were unruffled by my friend's pain, he might well wonder how much I really cared about him. Or suppose I neglected to do something I ought to have done, causing considerable inconvenience for someone else. Feeling sorry (not just saying it but feeling it) also seems fitting.

We did, indeed, evolve so that emotions, negative ones included, are part of our motivational system. Of course, sometimes our emotions can get in the way of responding well. But sometimes. the lack of emotion can have the same result.

That's how things are. Would it be better if they weren't? This is the sort of question I'm not sure we have a good basis for answering. The world it asks us to consider is too far from our experience for us to trust our judgment. Speaking for myself – human that I am – all I can say is that if I were given the chance never to feel sad about sad things, or never to feel regret about the regrettable, I wouldn't take it. For better or worse, the human form of life is the one I'd rather stick with.

  • Log in to post comments
Source URL: https://askphilosophers.org/question/4754
© 2005-2025 AskPhilosophers.org