The AskPhilosophers logo.

Philosophy

On 2/2, I asked: What I remember from my philosophy courses is the spirited debate, lively dialogue. For me this site is too question-and-answer, like the Stanford Online Encyclopedia that is often pointed to in the responses. Is there a place on the web where I can find a more dialogue-based form of philosophy? In reply, I received 2 replies bemoaning the quality of thinking found in philosophy chat rooms. I don't believe my question implied that I wanted to chat with morons in a "philosophy chat room", but let me clarify: I graduated with a BA in philosophy from what was then ranked as the #1 liberal arts college in the US, so I'd say I can tell the difference between people who can't reason their way out of paper bags, and philosophers. But the responders seem to imply that, at their level of philosophical accomplishment, there isn't much more to be said after one respondent has answered. In my view, this implies that the quality of the questions is poor, not provoking spirited dialogue from the panelists. Instead, I think many answers are more like what one panelist once called "pastoral counseling", urging his fellow panelists to avoid creating this kind of image of philosophy. So I'd like to reiterate my question and add an unnecessary caveat: Is there a place where I can find intelligent philosophical dialogue?
Accepted:
February 29, 2012

Comments

Alexander George
February 29, 2012 (changed February 29, 2012) Permalink

I don't know the answer to your question. There are many philosophy blogs (run by professional philosophers or by graduate students in philosophy) that allow the posting of comments; you might check out some of those to see if they answer to your needs.

This site does not yet offer any back-and-forth opportunities (though you might check out the associated Google Groups). Our original idea was to keep the signal-to-noise ratio as high as we possibly could. It would be desirable to add on a feature that would allow comments or more back-and-forth - but in a manner that allowed that feature to be "turned off" by those who prefer not to wade through those further levels of discussion. We're hoping that in a near-future enhancement of the site, we'll be able to implement that.

  • Log in to post comments

Stephen Maitzen
February 29, 2012 (changed February 29, 2012) Permalink

Just for the record, neither Prof. Smith nor I bemoaned the quality of thinking in philosophy chat rooms, having made it clear that neither of us had ever visited any. But we both have serious doubts about the quality of philosophical conversation to be found there, if any exist. My doubts stem from seeing non-philosophers post and comment on philosophical topics, as I said. With your own training in philosophy, you'd find those threads deeply disappointing too, I'm sure.

Prof. George suggested you might find the philosophical give-and-take you're seeking on blogs run by philosophers, but naturally those focus on whatever topics the bloggers currently find interesting. If your interests happen to match theirs, and if they allow comments, you'll find something on which to comment. David Chalmers maintains a long list of philosophy blogs here.

I myself like the way AskPhilosophers functions. You wrote, "[T]he responders seem to imply that, at their level of philosophical accomplishment, there isn't much more to be said after one respondent has answered. In my view, this implies that the quality of the questions is poor, not provoking spirited dialogue from the panelists." I wouldn't infer that the questions are of poor quality. Instead, they're often very good questions that philosophers have thought carefully about already, and rather than reinvent the wheel respondents direct questioners to repositories of that careful thinking. The best articles in the often-cited SEP give the reader a good sense of the give-and-take on the topic at hand, and the scholarly literature that they cite is pretty much all give-and-take of the highest quality to be found anywhere. Why not send people there?

I wish you success in finding what you're looking for.

  • Log in to post comments
Source URL: https://askphilosophers.org/question/4561
© 2005-2025 AskPhilosophers.org