The AskPhilosophers logo.

Logic

Hello, I would like to ask a kind of multiple angled question I have noticed a "lack of" while studying logic. Is "the process of elimination" a sound "Rule of Inference"? (Perhaps, we've all used this "process of elimination" in taking a multiple choice test.) I have read two books on Logic: one by Irving M.Copi & Carl Cohen as well as The Logic Book by Merrie Bergmann, James Moor, Jack Nelson. I have not seen a single logic text nor a logic website where "the process of elimination" appears as a inference rule. Why is this not included as a rule? Is it not considered Deductive? Does it go by another name? What is the deal? Thank you for considering this question in advance.
Accepted:
December 20, 2011

Comments

Richard Heck
December 22, 2011 (changed December 22, 2011) Permalink

It goes by another name, sometimes "argument by cases" or "argument by dilemma" or "the disjunctive syllogism". The basic rule is:

A ∨ B
~A
∴ B

Obviously, this can be extended to any number of disjuncts, e,g.:

A ∨ B ∨ C ∨ D
~A ∧ ~B ∧ ~C
∴ D

So the disjuncts represent the possibilities you have before you, and the negations represent your ruling out all but one of them.

There are quantificational versions as well, e.g.:

∀x(Fx → x = a ∨ x = b ∨ x = c)
~Fa ∧ ~Fb
∴ Fc

This would normally be derived from one of the propositional versions.

  • Log in to post comments
Source URL: https://askphilosophers.org/question/4457
© 2005-2025 AskPhilosophers.org