The AskPhilosophers logo.

Ethics

Dear Philosophers, I have been dating a woman for one year. She's been away studying at a university in another country for the last few months, but is coming back soon. All the time we've been together, she's had some problems that I think were depression. But now she's become worse, so that it's having a big impact on her daily life. She's getting treatment abroad, but attitudes towards and treatment of mental health problems are terrible back here. Our conversations together are no fun at all - we only talk about her daily problems, which I can't help with at all. I feel like this is all too much for me. But I also feel (1) I have a responsibility to help her through this, (2) she might commit suicide if I left her, (3) that it would be callous to give up faith in her getting better. For my own sake, I think I should break up, but I don't know how much weight to give to the above three concerns.
Accepted:
May 12, 2011

Comments

Charles Taliaferro
May 15, 2011 (changed May 15, 2011) Permalink

This is clearly a very difficult matter and I feel quite unqualified to reply, but it sounds as though there is a middle ground between staying in a dating relationship and (to use your terms) break up, leave her, give up faith in her, being callous. I suppose there are some relationships which are either romantic or simply not on, but perhaps in your case there has from the beginning been a combination of romance and friendship? You seem deeply concerned about her over the year you have been together (plus you feel responsible for her now) and this seems to be a sign of the deep care one has as a friend and for a friend. Option 2 seems like a corrosive, unsustainable reason for continuing a romantic relationship (I would think that 2 would feel like entrapment), but I wonder if you might be able to work on 1 and 3 but as a friend without the dating. Philosophers from Plato onward have (from time to time) worked on a philosophy of friendship, and most of them have concluded that it is marked (at best) by a beautiful benevolence in which one prizes the good of the one loved more than the desire (with or without eros) to be united with the beloved. Sometimes it seems romantic love needs to be subordinated to benevolent love, where you simply care about her well being, come what may. Every possible good wish on this and all matters, Charles

  • Log in to post comments
Source URL: https://askphilosophers.org/question/4050?page=0
© 2005-2025 AskPhilosophers.org