Topics Science

Question Why does giving authority to a sense of aesthetics sometimes lead to finding the wrong answer to a scientific question?

Accepted:
February 16, 2011

Comments

Good question! First, it must be said that sometimes aesthetic considerations seem to be quite positive scientifically, at least according to books like The Elegant Univers by Brian Greene: "In physics, as in art, symmetry is a key part of aesthetics." In the International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Eligan has argued that "Aesthetic devices are integral to science." And there have been various claims about how Einstein, Pincare, Heisenberg, Weyl, have been led by aesthetic considerations. On that, check out Truth and Beauty by Chandrasekhar. When you look at what is meant by "aesthetics" in this literature it sometimes refers to symmetry, simplicity, harmony, order, consistency, economy, unity, elegance, beauty... I suppose one way to answer your question is that aesthetics can lead to bad science if the sense of the beauty of a theory is somehow misplaced or there is (what we might think of later as an ugly) ignoring of evidence for the sake of a simplicity that is inadequate to the task. There have been scientists and philosophers who seem drawn to what they see as the elegant simplicity of scientific behaviorism, and yet such simplicity is at the expense (or so I suggest) of the reality of first-person subjective experience.

Question Why does giving authority to a sense of aesthetics sometimes lead to finding the wrong answer to a scientific question? Accepted:February 16, 2011

Question Why does giving authority to a sense of aesthetics sometimes lead to finding the wrong answer to a scientific question?

Accepted:
February 16, 2011