Ethics
You can make an argument that a particular route to Yellowstone is
the best one to take; and you can make an argument that a man should give up his lover and decide to remain with his wife. But doesn't that fact that in the second case there is no map, that in the end the man himself must decide, completely change the kind of argument being made and what it can do? A philosopher couldn't give that man the correct answer, could she, by improving the argument?
Accepted:February 9, 2011
Accepted:
February 9, 2011