The AskPhilosophers logo.

Religion

Early Islam meets almost every criteria for the definition of a "cult". Believers were removed their friends and families- from Mecca to "The Prophet's Town" Medina, unconditional love was given by a charismatic leader (Muhammad), believers received a new identity based on the group "Muslim", access to material critical of Muhammad or Islam was cut off (the murder of satirical poets by Muhammad), unwavering faith to the group was demanded, leaving the group was prohibited (death penalty for apostates), the beliefs of the group contradict logic and science, it was encouraged that group members only socialize and marry other group members, the threat of hellfire was used to control group members, the beliefs of the group are extremely absolutist ("Islam is the only true religion") and group members were encouraged to gain as many new followers as possible. According to these criteria can Islam still be considered a cult, or has it "evolved" into something else? Furthermore, if we can agree that it at least started out as a cult, should this negatively effect our opinion of Islam today?
Accepted:
October 19, 2010

Comments

Oliver Leaman
October 21, 2010 (changed October 21, 2010) Permalink

I do not recognize Islam from your description of it. Many religions contain events in their past history which look rather questionable, to put it mildly, and I suppose all new religions, although Islam represents itself as not new at all, will institute practices to try to maintain group solidarity and cohesion within an alien environment. Whether this makes them a cult or not is hardly important, since that is a term which is generally used to designate a religion or quasi-religion of which we disapprove.

  • Log in to post comments
Source URL: https://askphilosophers.org/question/3592
© 2005-2025 AskPhilosophers.org