The AskPhilosophers logo.

Ethics

This is the first sentence of Stanford Encyclopedia's article on rights: "Rights are entitlements (not) to perform certain actions, or (not) to be in certain states...." I checked my English dictionary, and it defines "right", in the relevant sense, as "entitlement", and "entitlement" as "right". In my own language (not English), there aren't even two different words for "right" and "entitlement", they must both be translated to the same word. I think we can conclude that "right" and "entitlement" are synonymous, as much as any two words can be. So do you think that there is any useful reading of that article's first three words? Thank you!
Accepted:
September 10, 2010

Comments

Thomas Pogge
September 12, 2010 (changed September 12, 2010) Permalink

I agree that the word "entitlement" isn't helpful as an explication of "right" -- though the sentence still has some use by specifying the possible objects of rights (i.e. those things that a right might be a right to). As an editor of the SEP (though not of this particular entry) and as a friend of the author, I'll relay your concern and see whether we can get this changed.

  • Log in to post comments

Thomas Pogge
September 13, 2010 (changed September 13, 2010) Permalink

The author of the "Rights" article has now sent me a long response. If you want to see it and/or want me to put you two in touch, please send your e-address to thomas.pogge@yale.edu

  • Log in to post comments
Source URL: https://askphilosophers.org/question/3517
© 2005-2025 AskPhilosophers.org