The AskPhilosophers logo.

Justice

In political debate, I often feel that participants on both sides are "unprincipled" or "unscrupulous" - they deliberately downplay inconvenient facts and exaggerate other facts in order to promote their positions. I understand that politicians represent the interests of their constituents much as lawyers advocate for their clients. But are there any philosophical writings that at least encourage citizens to elevate their own level of political discourse so that it more resembles a search for truth as opposed to a clash of opposing interests?
Accepted:
August 24, 2010

Comments

Thomas Pogge
September 6, 2010 (changed September 6, 2010) Permalink

There are several classical attempts to do just that. The two most influential, perhaps, are those Plato makes in his Republic and Jean-Jacques Rousseau's in Of the Social Contract. I have tried a somewhat different tack in regard to international politics in T. Pogge World Poverty and Human Rights (Polity 2008), ch. 5: "The Bounds of Nationalism," esp. pp. 126-30.

  • Log in to post comments
Source URL: https://askphilosophers.org/question/3469?page=0
© 2005-2025 AskPhilosophers.org