Philosophy
Is there anything right about this characterization of a philosophical problem:
a person torn because she doesn't know what to do about her marriage would not be
a philosophical problem in the sense that no philosopher or no moral theory could
tell the person what to do, in the sense of giving her the one correct moral answer;
but asking whether the personal has any reality, whether we can really speak of a
person making a responsible moral decision at all, that would be something philosophers
would try to prove against skeptical challenges. Is something like that what philosophy
is about?
Accepted:April 22, 2010
Accepted:
April 22, 2010