The AskPhilosophers logo.

Ethics
Religion
Value

Members of the Abrahamic faiths believe that we are all children of God and all equal in the eye of God. Therefore our lives are sacred and have an inherent equality of value that is beyond price. However, if God does not exist then a human life cannot be sacred. In this context can its value be beyond price? And if not, upon what basis should its value be calculated? It appears to me that if a human life has no inherent value then its only value is its social value, which for most purposes is its market value. But in that case there are categories of person whose lives cost more to society at large than they personally contribute, so that their social value is negative. And so logically it would appear on grounds of economy and social utility, and upon Darwinian principles of survival of the fittest, that such lives should be eliminated. Upon what rational grounds could one dispute this?
Accepted:
August 22, 2009

Comments

Oliver Leaman
August 27, 2009 (changed August 27, 2009) Permalink

Surely one does not have to be religious to think that life has inherent value, one would just identify that value without reference to religion. Life would not perhaps be sacred, but still could be seen as having value, and that value need not be linked to its social role or economic standing. You don't have to be religious to respect people, quite the contrary. It might even be said that without religion respect is more unconditional, since there would then be no religious limitations on its breadth!

  • Log in to post comments
Source URL: https://askphilosophers.org/question/2839?page=0
© 2005-2025 AskPhilosophers.org