The AskPhilosophers logo.

Environment
Ethics

Do we have an obligation from preventing one wild plant or animal species from wiping out another? For instance, is it morally problematic to introduce to an ocean habitat an exotic species of fish which goes on to drive species to extinction? (Set aside the question of whether such a thing might also be problematic on, say, practical grounds.) Or do we simply say: "Well, the exotic fish have just as much a right to survive as the natives, so let's not worry if the former kill off the latter."
Accepted:
February 23, 2009

Comments

Oliver Leaman
February 26, 2009 (changed February 26, 2009) Permalink

I suppose we have the right to sponsor the sort of environment we favor, other things being equal, and where species live off each other we have to accept that there will be victims and there will be victors. Introducing a new and dangerous species seems wrong unless it has some practical benefit, or was designed to save it from an imminent disaster. Wiping out a species irretrievably reduces variety, and there is no reason why we should not value variety in our idea of an environment and seek to foster it, perhaps for aesthetic reasons alone.

  • Log in to post comments
Source URL: https://askphilosophers.org/question/2582
© 2005-2025 AskPhilosophers.org