The AskPhilosophers logo.

Justice

This is a follow-up to question 1522 [www.askphilosophers/question/1522). In my language, there is a single word for "justice" and "fairness" ("justiça"). If someone in an English-speaking movie says "That ain't fair!", the translation will probably use our word for "just". So, it is really very difficult for me to understand Rawls's claim that justice is fairness. How could justiça not be justiça?
Accepted:
December 31, 2006

Comments

Oliver Leaman
January 5, 2007 (changed January 5, 2007) Permalink

I don't see the difficulty. Rawls tried to show how his conception of justice really does establish the parameters of justice, i.e. fairness. When we wonder whether some distribution is just we consider whether it is fair, and if it is, then it is just. Of course, we tend to disagree on what counts as just, but whatever it is, it has to be fair also.

  • Log in to post comments
Source URL: https://askphilosophers.org/question/1526
© 2005-2025 AskPhilosophers.org