The AskPhilosophers logo.

Philosophers

What do legitimate philosophers think of Ken Wilber and his brand of pop philosophy/psychology? Wilber claims to have developed a framework that situates and contextualizes all of the world’s wisdom traditions and, by containing them, claims to have transcended their insights to a greater vision that can alone perceive their limitations. If Wilber (and his disturbingly devoted followers) are anywhere close to right, it would seem vital that every human involved in the search for truth should know him and his work, but he is virtually unknown outside of his undeniably new-agey audience. Does he have anything substantial to offer?
Accepted:
November 13, 2006

Comments

Alexander George
November 16, 2006 (changed November 16, 2006) Permalink

Philosophy is a bit like pornography: hard to define what it is, but one knows it when one sees it. There is much that passes for, or is called, philosophy in contemporary culture that has little substantive connection to the texts, questions, arguments, currents, and tensions that I would consider part of philosophy.

  • Log in to post comments
Source URL: https://askphilosophers.org/question/1457
© 2005-2025 AskPhilosophers.org