The AskPhilosophers logo.

Sex

Is there a way of thinking that does not separate the profession of prostitution to that of say marriage or similar relationships people have together? And if so, how do they come to this conclusion? Personally as an ex-prostitute myself I see no difference, save for length of contract.
Accepted:
November 10, 2006

Comments

Alan Soble
November 16, 2006 (changed November 16, 2006) Permalink

See Friedrich Engels (philosophical collaborator of Marx): In capitalism, marriage degenerates "often enough into the crassest prostitution"; the married woman "only differs from the ordinary courtesan in that she does not let out her body on piece-work as a wage earner, but sells it once and for all into slavery" (p. 82). This is from his 1884 book, The Origin of the Family, Private Property, and the State. New York: International Publishers, 1942. Peking, China: Foreign Languages Press, 1978. The other locus classicus is this 1917 essay by Emma Goldman: "The Traffic in Women," in the collection Anarchism and Other Essays. New York: Dover, 1969, pp. 177-94. An nice overview of the issue is provided in Alison Jaggar's "Prostitution," in Alan Soble, ed., The Philosophy of Sex: Contemporary Readings, 1st edition. Totowa, N.J.: Littlefield, Adams, 1980, pp. 348-68. Not only Marxists and Feminists have made the point (or drawn the comparison); sociobiologists and evolutionary psychologists who argue that women trade sex for resources in marriage also make it. See, for example, Donald Symons, The Evolution of Human Sexuality. Oxford, Eng.: Oxford University Press, 1979. This territory is covered in several entries in Sex from Plato to Paglia: A Philosophical Encyclopedia (Greenwood Press, 2006).

  • Log in to post comments
Source URL: https://askphilosophers.org/question/1452
© 2005-2025 AskPhilosophers.org