The AskPhilosophers logo.

Music

Is music a language? And if so what requirements should a language satisfy?
Accepted:
May 13, 2006

Comments

Mark Sprevak
May 15, 2006 (changed May 15, 2006) Permalink

There is no uncontroversial definition of a language. However, a requirement that is often cited is that there should be rules on how different elements of a language are composed together (syntax). Another requirement is that the elements of a language should have representational content (semantics).

Music arguably passes the first requirement: notes cannot be strung together in any way one likes to make music. But it appears to fail the second requirement: it is not obvious that individual musical notes represent anything at all. One might argue that sometimes there are phrases in music that do represent: for example, different instrumental lines in Prokofiev's Peter and the Wolf represent the activities of different animals. But these tend to be rather isolated cases of representation; they are not as widespread and systematic as one would expect from a language (e.g. flutes in music do not always represent birds, or indeed anything at all).

Even if music is not a language in the above sense, that does not mean that there aren't interesting connections between language and music, or that our linguistic and musical abilities aren't related.

  • Log in to post comments
Source URL: https://askphilosophers.org/question/1167
© 2005-2025 AskPhilosophers.org