The AskPhilosophers logo.

Knowledge

Logically, the view entailed by solipsism (i.e., that I cannot prove that there exists anything beyond my own consciousness) seems impossible to refute. How do philosophers persuade themselves not to stop at this position and abandon all further enquiry as futile?
Accepted:
January 2, 2006

Comments

Richard Heck
January 2, 2006 (changed January 2, 2006) Permalink

As has often been mentioned here, one cannot "prove" very much, if "prove" means something like: Establish beyond absolutely all doubt, reasonable or otherwise. It simply does not follow, however, that one cannot know very much. To suppose otherwise is to suppose that one can know only what one can "prove", and there is simply no reason to believe that. That said, it may yet be (and I take it, indeed still is) a puzzle what exactly it is to know something.

  • Log in to post comments
Source URL: https://askphilosophers.org/question/815?page=0
© 2005-2025 AskPhilosophers.org