The AskPhilosophers logo.

Language

When the 1st word was spoken (i.e., Oog the caveman says "rock"), could it have been really understood without a language in place? Could Oog have really understood he was saying rock unless he already had the system in place. In other words would Oog have to have a word for "I", "am", "going", "to", "name", and "this", etc.? In other words would not the 1st intelligent being to speak something intelligible have to have a basic language in place? If this is true, then what would be the ramifications of that? Maybe the question should be posed, "Is it possible to think without a language?"
Accepted:
October 16, 2005

Comments

Richard Heck
October 18, 2005 (changed October 18, 2005) Permalink

Have you ever had a dog or a cat? Most people find that it is possible to communicate with their animals to some degree. And plausibly, language grew out of much more primitive forms of communication.

  • Log in to post comments
Source URL: https://askphilosophers.org/question/250
© 2005-2025 AskPhilosophers.org