The AskPhilosophers logo.

Philosophers

Hello experts, I have a question that burns my mind. Rorty is usually considered as one of the most significant philosophers of today. However, I simply cannot understand him. Firstly, he speaks against epistemology, yet he argues for "pragmatism" (which I presume is a theory of knowledge). Secondly, he argues against metaphysics, yet he argues for "eliminative materialism" (which I presume is a theory of metaphysics). What is happening here? Seems illogical to me.
Accepted:
October 10, 2005

Comments

Peter Lipton
November 1, 2005 (changed November 1, 2005) Permalink

Here is a cartoon version of Rorty's radical philosophy. The job of language and thought is not to represent an independent reality, but to give us tools that help us to thrive. Some thoughts and ways of talking are better than others, because more conducive to thriving than others, and Rorty is trying to convince us that pragmatism talk and eliminative materialist talk is better in that sense.

  • Log in to post comments
Source URL: https://askphilosophers.org/question/96
© 2005-2025 AskPhilosophers.org