Hierarchical compatiblism says that I have free will if I have the will I want

Hierarchical compatiblism says that I have free will if I have the will I want

Hierarchical compatiblism says that I have free will if I have the will I want to have. The theory claims to show that my desires can be up to me. I understand how the theory improves upon classic compatiblism by showing that the absence of external constraint is not sufficient for freedom. But it is unclear to me how second order desires or volitions are genuinely up to me if they are causally necessitated by the relevant laws of nature and background conditions. Can any form of compatiblism, however sophisticated, survive the scrutiny of hard determinism?

Read another response by Stephen Maitzen
Read another response about Freedom