Given the proclivity of animals to fight for both resources and territory as

Given the proclivity of animals to fight for both resources and territory as

War

Given the proclivity of animals to fight for both resources and territory as natural competition, is it not possible to justify nearly any war? Even as a "higher order" species, as the population increases so too will competition. How has the idea that the strong shall not take from the meek become reprehensible? Isn't it simply natural?

Read another response by Richard Heck
Read another response about War
Print